ルーマニア王室の園遊会(2012年5月)

 2012年5月10日のルーマニア王室の園遊会の映像です。

 

CasaRegalaaRomaniei(ルーマニア王室公式チャンネル):
Antena3 – Casa Regala sarbatoreste astazi Ziua Regalitatii – YouTube

 

訃報(2007年4月9日):プロイセン王子ヴィルヘルム=カール殿下が薨去(1922~2007)

 2007年4月9日、プロイセン王子ヴィルヘルム=カール殿下(His Royal Highness Prince Wilhelm-Karl of Prussia : Wilhelm-Karl Prinz von Preußenヴィルヘルム=カール・プリンツ・フォン・プロイセン)が薨去された模様です。
 1922年1月30日生まれの85歳。

 ルター派の聖ヨハネ騎士団ブランデンブルク大管区管長などを務めました。

離婚(2007年3月):ホーエンツォレルン公子フェルフリート殿下、3度目の離婚

 ホーエンツォレルン公子フェルフリート殿下(His Serene Highness Prince Ferfried of Hohenzollern)が、マヤ・マイナート夫人(Maja Meinert)と離婚したそうです。
 フェルフリート殿下の離婚は今回で三度目。いずれの結婚も貴賤結婚と考えられますが、一度目・二度目の結婚で生まれた子女にプリンス(Prince)・プリンセス(Princess)を用いて表記している情報もあります。

 フェルフリート公子殿下は、ホーエンツォレルン公フリードリヒ・ヴィルヘルム殿下の弟で、1943年4月14日生まれの63歳です。

 

Line of succession to the former Russian throne

note:
As of July 2020.

See also:
Line of succession to the former Monarchical throne and others : From (deleted) Wikipedia’s articles.


The Monarchy of Russia was abolished in 1917 following the February Revolution, which forced Emperor Nicholas II (1868–1918) to abdicate. Claims made on behalf of different persons to be the rightful current pretender continue to be debated.

Since 1992, the most widely acknowledged pretender is Maria Vladimirovna, Grand Duchess of Russia,[1][2] a great-great-granddaughter in the male-line of Emperor Alexander II of Russia, having proclaimed herself the head of the imperial house upon her father’s death.[1][3] She also declared her son George Mikhailovich (born 1981) to be the heir-apparent.[1]

Potential successors in March 1917

In the succession chart below, the number preceding each name indicates that individual’s position in the order of succession to the throne at the time of the abdication of Nicholas II. For instance, Alexei Nikolaevich was the first in line, as the Emperor’s only son. The numbers following each name indicates the line of descent and genealogical seniority from Nicholas I of Russia. For instance, Alexei Nikolaevich, 1.2.1.1, as follows from Nicholas I.[4]

Many of the individuals on this list died without legitimate issue; some were killed during the Russian Revolution.

  • Emperor Nicholas I (1796–1855)
    • Emperor Alexander II (1818–1881) (1)
      • Emperor Alexander III (1845–1894) (1.2)
        • Emperor Nicholas II (born 1868) (1.2.1) (killed on 17 July 1918)
          • (1) Tsesarevich Alexei Nikolaevich (b. 1904) (1.2.1.1) (killed on 17 July 1918)
        • (2) Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovich (b. 1878) (1.2.4) (killed on 12 June 1918)
          • George Mikhailovich, Count Brasov (b. 1910)
      • Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich (1847–1909) (1.3)
        • (3) Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich (b. 1876) (1.3.2)
        • (4) Grand Duke Boris Vladimirovich (b. 1877) (1.3.3)
        • (5) Grand Duke Andrew Vladimirovich (b. 1879) (1.3.4)
          • Prince Vladimir Romanovsky-Krasinsky (b. 1902)
      • (6) Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich (b. 1860) (1.6) (killed on 28 January 1919)
        • (7) Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich (b. 1891) (1.6.1)
    • Grand Duke Constantine Nikolaevich (1827–1892) (2)
      • (8) Grand Duke Nicholas Konstantinovich (b. 1850) (2.1) (officially declared insane and exiled in 1874 after theft accusation)
      • Grand Duke Konstantin Konstantinovich of Russia (1858–1915) (2.2)
        • (9) Prince John Konstantinovich (b. 1886) (2.2.1) (killed on 18 July 1918)
          • (10) Prince Vsevolod Ivanovich (b. 1914) (2.2.1.1)
        • (11) Prince Gabriel Konstantinovich (b. 1887) (2.2.2)
        • (12) Prince Constantine Konstantinovich (b. 1891) (2.2.3) (killed on 18 July 1918)
        • (13) Prince Igor Konstantinovich (b. 1894) (2.2.5) (killed on 18 July 1918)
        • (14) Prince George Konstantinovich (b. 1903) (2.2.6)
      • (15) Grand Duke Dmitri Konstantinovich (b. 1860) (2.3) (killed on 28 January 1919)
    • Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich (1831–1891) (3)
      • (16) Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich (b. 1856) (3.1)
      • (17) Grand Duke Peter Nikolaevich (b. 1864) (3.2)
        • (18) Prince Roman Petrovich (b. 1896) (3.2.1)
    • Grand Duke Michael Nikolaevich (1832–1909) (4)
      • (19) Grand Duke Nicholas Mikhailovich (b. 1859) (4.1) (killed on 28 January 1919)
      • (20) Grand Duke Michael Mikhailovich (b. 1861) (4.2) (morganatic marriage on 26 February 1891)
      • (21) Grand Duke George Mikhailovich (b. 1863) (4.3) (killed on 28 January 1919)
      • (22) Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich (b. 1866) (4.4)
        • (23) Prince Andrew Alexandrovich (b. 1897) (4.4.1)
        • (24) Prince Feodor Alexandrovich (b. 1898) (4.4.2)
        • (25) Prince Nikita Alexandrovich (b. 1900) (4.4.3)
        • (26) Prince Dmitri Alexandrovich (b. 1901) (4.4.4)
        • (27) Prince Rostislav Alexandrovich (b. 1902) (4.4.5)
        • (28) Prince Vasili Alexandrovich (b. 1907) (4.4.6)
      • (29) Grand Duke Sergei Mikhailovich (b. 1869) (4.5) (killed on 18 July 1918)

Claims since 1917

Michael Alexandrovich (1917–1918)

Brother of Nicholas II, who abdicated in 1917.

Nicholas Nikolaevich (1922–1929)

Grandson of Nicholas I. Proclaimed Tsar of Russia by the Provisional Priamurye Government, which controlled portions of the Russian Far East. His rule was nominal as he was in exile during the entirety of his reign. He was without issue on his death in 1929 at the age of 72.

Kirillovichi branch (1924–present)

Kirill Vladimirovich (1924–1938)

Main article: Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich of Russia

At first, many members of the Imperial House either did not believe or were wary of acting on news of the demise of the immediate imperial family. However, camps started to be formed in the monarchist movement, where Paris was a focal location. Several monarchists grouped around Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich, who was first in the line of succession by male primogeniture after the execution of Alexei Nikolaevich and Michael Alexandrovich. Many of Kirill’s opponents grouped around a young grand duke, Dmitri Pavlovich, who was next in the line of succession if Kirill and his brothers, the Vladimirovichi, were ineligible (Paul Alexandrovich, who had been ahead of Dmitri, had been killed in 1919), though Dimitri himself refused these advances, supporting instead Grand Duke Kirill as emperor.[5] Several grouped around the old Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich, appreciating his career as general and former commander-in-chief, or his position as the oldest member of the imperial dynasty. On August 8, 1922, Nicholas was proclaimed as the emperor of all Russia by the Zemsky Sobor of the Priamursk region, convened in Vladivostok by General Mikhail Diterikhs. At the time, Grand Duke Nicholas was already living abroad and consequently was not present at the Sobor. Two months later, the Priamursk region fell to the Bolsheviks.

Nicholas and Dmitri never publicly proclaimed themselves pretenders, but Kirill Vladimirovich assumed on 8 August 1922 the position of curator of the throne. On 31 August 1924 he proclaimed himself Kirill I, Emperor of all the Russias. With the assumption of the Imperial title his children were elevated to the title and styles of Grand Duke and Grand Duchesses of Russia according to the Statutes of the Imperial Family and the Laws of the Russian Empire.[6] Grand Duke Kirill’s role as head of the House was recognised, and the oath of loyalty signed by every male dynast of the House of Romanov, except Grand Duke Nicholas, his brother Grand Duke Peter, and the latter’s son, Prince Roman Petrovich.[7] Nicholas, one of the other monarchist alternatives, died in 1929. Kirill held his court-in-exile in France, erecting a secretariat for the monarchist movement.

Vladimir Kirillovich (1938–1992)

Main article: Grand Duke Vladimir Kirillovich of Russia

Kirill died in 1938, and was succeeded as pretender by his only son Vladimir Kirillovich, who chose to assume the title of Grand Duke rather than that of Emperor.[8]

The Kirillovichi supporters claim that Grand Duke Vladimir Kirillovich was the sole male dynast of the Imperial House to enter into an equal marriage after 1917. Opponents refute the equality of this marriage. In 1946, responding to a question from the Spanish Royal House on whether the House of Bagration-Moukhrani could now, after the dissolution of the Russian Empire, be considered of royal (i.e. equal) rank, the Grand Duke issued a statement confirming the formerly sovereign status and royal titulature of the senior branch (i.e., Moukhransky) of the Royal House of Georgia.[9] On August 13, 1948, he married Princess Leonida Bagration-Moukransky. The Grand Duke’s marriage to Princess Leonida is controversial; some consider it to be morganatic (although the princess belonged to a dynasty that had ruled as kings in Armenia and Georgia since the early Middle Ages until 1810, the family had been reduced to the status of Russian nobility for over a century prior to the Russian Revolution — Leonida’s branch had not been regnant in the male line as kings of Georgia since 1505).[10] The Romanov Family Association, whose bylaws prohibit support of anyone for Russia’s defunct throne, recognised neither Vladimir Kirillovich nor his daughter Maria Vladimirovna as rightful claimants.

However, having recognised the Moukhransky branch of the House of Bagration as a former royal dynasty in 1946 in his claimed capacity as head of the (likewise deposed) House of Romanov, he declared his 1948 marriage to Princess Leonida to be dynastic, notwithstanding her family’s status as Russian subjects at the end of the monarchy. From the time of their marriage in 1948 she assumed her husband’s rank, bearing the title Grand Duchess of Russia and the style Her Imperial Highness.

In 1969 Vladimir, expressing his opinion that the House of Romanov faced almost inevitable extinction in the dynastic male line, proclaimed his daughter Maria Vladimirovna the future curatrix of the throne, implying that she would ultimately succeed. That act angered other dynasts and groups in monarchist circles. Three Romanov dynasts, Princes Vsevold, Andrei and Roman wrote to Vladimir, addressing him as “Prince” rather than “Grand Duke”, asserting that Maria Vladimirovna’s mother was of no higher status than the wife of any other dynastic Romanov prince. They also said that they did not recognise Maria Vladimirovna as a grand duchess and that his proclamation declaring her the dynasty’s future curatrix was illegal.[11]

In 1989, when Prince Vasili Alexandrovich of Russia (who was also the President of the Romanov Family Association, see discussion of succession controversy below), died, Vladimir immediately proclaimed his daughter as the dynasty’s heiress, as Prince Vasili was the last male Romanov other than himself whom, having been born of an equal marriage, Vladimir recognised as a dynast.

Maria Vladimirovna (1992–present)

Main article: Maria Vladimirovna, Grand Duchess of Russia

When Vladimir Kirillovich died in 1992, Maria Vladimirovna proclaimed herself the new Head of the Imperial House,[3] assuming the position of Head of the House and proclaiming her son George Mikhailovich the heir-apparent. Her son, who was born in 1981, was given the patronymic “Mikhailovich” because from 1976 until her divorce in 1985, Maria was married to Prince Franz Wilhelm of Prussia, who was granted the title “His Imperial Highness Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich of Russia” by Vladimir. Maria styles herself “Her Imperial Highness Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia” as her title of pretension, and her son styles himself “His Imperial Highness Grand Duke Georgi Mikhailovich of Russia” as his title of pretension.

Nikolaevichi branch (1992-2016)

Nicholas Romanov (1992–2014)

Main article: Nicholas Romanov, Prince of Russia

In 1979, seven undisputed male and female dynasts founded the Romanov Family Association (RFA), which by the end of the same year had admitted more than half of the surviving undisputed dynasts into its membership, as well as a fair number of those male-line descendants Vladimir did not recognise as dynasts because of morganatic birth. Vladimir Kirillovich never joined the association and neither has his daughter Maria.

The RFA, which included the last two surviving females recognised as dynasts among its membership, chose Prince Nicholas Romanov, as its president in 1989, following the death of Prince Vasili Alexandrovich of Russia, the only undisputed male dynast still living at that time other than Vladimir Kirillovich. The RFA’s official position, expressed in its founding charter, is that the Russian nation should determine which sort of government its people desire and, if the choice is monarchy, who should be monarch. Nonetheless, once Vladimir was no longer alive, Prince Nicholas Romanov was recognised as the head of the Imperial House of Romanov while serving as third president of the RFA by the members of the family, with the exception of Maria Vladimirovna and her son George Mikhailovich.[12] Following the death of Vladimir Kirillovich in April 1992, Nicholas took “H.H. Prince of Russia” as his title of pretension.[13][14]

Dimitri Romanov (2014–2016)

After Nicholas’ death in 2014, his brother Prince Dimitri Romanov took up the claim. Dimitri had affirmed in July 2009 that his brother Nicholas, and not Maria Vladimirovna, was the Head of the Imperial Family, simultaneously declaring, however, that pursuant to a 1992 family meeting he attended in Paris, all of the then living senior male descendants of the House of Romanov agreed not to put forward any claim.[15] Prince Dimitri died childless in 2016, extinguishing the asserted claims of the Romanovs of the Nikolayevich branch with the death of the last male of that line.

Mikhailovichi branch (2016-present)

Andrew Romanov (2016–present)

This claim then passed on to the line of Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich, in the person of Andrew Andreevich, Prince of Russia.

House of Leiningen

Nikolai Kirillovich (2013–present)

See also: Prince Karl Emich of Leiningen and Romanov Empire (micronation)

Prince Karl Emich of Leiningen (born 1952), converted to the Eastern Orthodox faith in 2013,[16] in order to pretend the Russian throne under the name of Prince Nikolai Kirillovich of Leiningen-Romanov. He is the grandson of Grand Duchess Maria Kirillovna of Russia (sister of Vladimir, and aunt of Maria Vladimirovna) and great-grandson of Kirill Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia. The Monarchist Party of Russia supports Prince Nikolai as the heir of the Russian throne, since they are of the opinion that neither Maria Vladimirovna Romanova nor Nicholas Romanov qualified as dynasts.[16] In early 2014, Nikolai Kirilovich declared himself Emperor Nicholas III and sovereign the “Romanov Empire” (also known as “Imperial Throne”), a micronation founded in 2011 by monarchist businessman and politician Anton Bakov.[17]

Karl Emich was disinherited and gave up use of the Leiningen Fürstliche title because of his parents’ disapproval of his second (and morganatic) marriage to a commoner.[18] His younger brother Andreas became the Prince of Leiningen.[18] In 2007, Nicholas married Countess Isabelle von und zu Egloffstein, who gave birth to their only son, Emich, in 2010.

Succession controversy

In applying Romanov House Law to determine headship of the dynasty, it must be determined if there are surviving male dynasts of the House of Romanov and then which among them is entitled to claim the Romanov legacy pursuant to house law. If only one male Romanov dynast survives, his claim precedes that of any female Romanov dynast or any male lawfully descended in the female line from a male Romanov dynast. If no Romanov male dynast survives, semi-salic succession is invoked, and the title passes to the last surviving male dynast’s closest female relative. In that case, one must assess who the last surviving male dynast was: Some consider this to have been Vladimir Kirillovich, while others upheld that status for Paul Romanovsky-Ilyinsky of Palm Beach and, subsequently, for their cousins Nicholas Romanovich and Dimitri Romanovich of the Nikolayevich branch. Still others have supported the claims of other surviving male relatives in the male lines of Grand Dukes Dimitri Pavlovich or Alexander Nikolayevich. Females of male-line Romanov descent who have been deemed by some to have succeeded the last male include Maria Vladimirovna and Catherine Ioanovna (of the Konstantinovich branch of the family). Semi-salic succession as applied under the house law might also allocate the claim to the defunct Russian throne to a male who descends through dynastically valid marriages from any daughter of Alexander III, Alexander II or Nicholas I, provided that he is or is willing to become Eastern Orthodox.

Line of Maria Vladimirovna

If one accepts that Vladimir Kirillovich’s marriage to Leonida Georgievna Bagration-Moukhranskaya was non-morganatic and that he was succeeded by his daughter Maria Vladimirovna then the line of succession is:

  1. Grand Duke George Mikhailovich (born 1981), who has been styled Grand Duke of Russia since birth, also a Prince of Prussia (a title which he does not generally use)

 

 

George is, as yet, the only descendant of Grand Duchess Maria. If both died without further male heirs, the succession would then follow semi-Salic law and the right to the Imperial Crown will presumably pass either to Andreas, Prince of Leiningen, as the nearest male relation to Maria and her son that is not descended from Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich through morganatic marriage, or to the nearest non-morganatically descended male Eastern Orthodox relative.

Line of Andrew Romanov

The line of succession to Prince Andrew Romanov based on descent from Emperor Nicholas I of Russia is:

  • Emperor Nicholas I (1796–1855)
    • Emperor Alexander II (1818–1881)
      • Emperor Alexander III (1845–1894)
        • Emperor Nicholas II (1868–1918)
      • Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich of Russia (1847–1909)
        • Kirill Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia (1876–1938)
          • Grand Duke Vladimir Kirillovich of Russia (1917–1992)
            • Maria Vladimirovna, Grand Duchess of Russia (born 1953)
              • Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia (b. 1981)
      • Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich (1860–1919)
        • Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich (1891–1942)
          • Prince Paul Dmitriievich Romanov-Ilyinsky (1928–2004)
            • Prince Dimitri Pavlovich Romanov-Ilyinsky (b. 1954)
            • Prince Michael Pavlovich Romanov-Ilyinsky (b. 1959)
    • Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich of Russia (1831–1891)
      • Grand Duke Peter Nikolaevich of Russia (1864–1931)
        • Prince Roman Petrovich of Russia (1896–1978)
          • Prince Nicholas Romanovich (1922–2014)
          • Prince Dimitri Romanovich (1926–2016)
    • Grand Duke Michael Nikolaevich of Russia (1832–1909)
      • Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich of Russia (1866–1933)
        • Prince Andrei Alexandrovich of Russia (1897–1981)
          • Prince Andrew Andreevich (born 1923)
            • (1) Prince Alexis Andreevich (b. 1953)
            • (2) Prince Peter Andreevich (b. 1961)
            • (3) Prince Andrew Andreevich (b. 1963)
        • Prince Rostislav Alexandrovich of Russia (1902–1978)
          • Prince Rostislav Rostislavovich (1938–1999)
            • (4) Prince Rostislav Rostislavovich (b. 1985)
            • (5) Prince Nikita Rostislavovich (b. 1987)
          • Prince Nicholas Rostislavovich (1945–2000)
            • (6) Prince Nicholas Christopher Nikolaievich (b. 1968)
            • (7) Prince Daniel Joseph Nikolaievich (b. 1972)
              • (8) Prince Jackson Daniel Danilovich (b. 2009)

 

 

Other Romanov descendants

  1. Andreas, Prince of Leiningen (born 1955): He is a grandson of Grand Duchess Maria Kirillovna of Russia (sister of Vladimir and aunt of Maria Vladimirovna), and great-grandson of Kirill Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia. His eldest brother is a claimant to the Russian throne since 2013. He is also a second cousin of George Mikhailovich, as his paternal grandmother (Maria) was the eldest sister of George’s maternal grandfather (Vladimir). He is the head of the princely House of Leiningen.
  2. Ferdinand, Hereditary Prince of Leiningen (born 1982): He is the son of the previous.
  3. Georg Friedrich of Hohenzollern, Prince of Prussia (born 1976): He is grandson of Grand Duchess Kira Kirillovna of Russia (sister of Vladimir and aunt of Maria Vladimirovna), and great-grandson of Kirill Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia. He is also a second cousin of George Mikhailovich, as his paternal grandmother (Kira) was the younger sister of George’s maternal grandfather (Vladimir). Prince Georg Friedrich is the head of the Prussian Royal House and German Imperial House.
  4. Alexander Karađorđević, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia (born 1945): He is a great-grandson of Marie of Romania, daughter of Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia (Maria Alexandrovna was aunt of Kirill Vladimirovich, the father of Vladimir Kirilllovich and therefore grandfather of Maria Vladimirovna). He is the head of the Yugoslavian/Serbian Royal House.

Dynastic marriage

Vladimir Kirillovich and Princess Leonida Bagration-Mukhransky
  • Under the semi-Salic succession promulgated by Emperor Paul I of Russia, when the last male Romanov dynast died, the succession would pass to his closest female relative with valid succession rights. Vladimir Kirilllovich contended that he was the last male Romanov dynast because all other males descended from Emperor Nicholas I of Russia married morganatically, in violation of the Romanov House Law, with the result that their offspring did not possess any inheritance rights to the Russian throne. Accordingly, he declared that his daughter Maria Vladimirovna would succeed as his closest female relative. When he died in 1992, Maria thus claimed to have succeeded as the Head of the Imperial Family of Russia.[19]
  • The main objection raised to this argument is that Maria’s mother, Princess Leonida Bagration-Mukhransky, was not a member of a royal or sovereign house, and that Maria’s parents’ marriage was therefore morganatic. The House of Mukhrani (Bagration-Mukhransky) was originally a cadet branch of the Bagrationi dynasty which ruled the Georgian medieval Kingdom of Kartli and reigned in the Kingdom of Imereti until 1810. After Georgia’s annexation by the Russian Empire, they had been regarded as nobility, rather than royalty, by the Russian court. Genealogically the eldest surviving Bagratid branch, the Mukranskys claimed to represent the deposed royal dynasty during their years of European exile from Georgia. However the patrilineal descendants of the last king of Georgia – the Bagration-Gruzinskys – remained in Georgia throughout the era of the Soviet Empire, and since its fall and the revival of a monarchist movement they actively contest the Mukhranskys’ claim.[20]
  • Maria and her defenders argue that the Bagration-Mukhranskys were indeed royal, and that the marriage was thus between equals.[20] Moreover, the Head of the Imperial House approved the marriage, consistent with Russian law according to which the Tsar determined whether a marriage was dynastically valid.[20] Vladimir, who was de jure Emperor, had decided two years before his own marriage that the Bagrations were of “corresponding rank,” in a letter to Prince Ferdinand of Bavaria, Infante of Spain regarding the marriage of the latter’s daughter, Princess Maria de las Mercedes de Baviera y Borbón, to Prince Irakly Bagration-Mukhransky.[20] This decision differs from that made in 1911 when, according to the Almanach de Gotha, Princess Tatiana Constantinovna of Russia morganatically wed Prince Constantine Alexandrovich Bagration-Mukhransky, a member of the same branch of the House of Bagration into which Princess Leonida would later be born.[21] Juan, Count of Barcelona, then Head of the Royal House of Spain, considered the issue of Princess Maria de las Mercedes’ marriage to be disqualified from the Spanish succession. The only son of this marriage was sponsored at his baptism by the Count of Barcelona but the latter’s refusal to recognize his god-son as a Spanish dynast led to the Bagrations’ alienation from the Spanish Royal Family, according to Guy Stair Sainty. Even Tatiana Konstantinovna’s marriage was legally a morganatic marriage. It was, in fact, the first marriage in the dynasty conducted in compliance with the Emperor’s formal decision not to accept as dynastic the marriages of even the most junior Romanovs — those that bore only the title of prince/princess — with non-royal partners.[20]
  • Maria’s opponents counter that approval by the Head of the Imperial House cannot make a marriage valid if it violates a provision of the Imperial Russian Law, such as the prohibition against marriages with rank disparity. If this marriage between a dynast and a subject noblewoman (a wife who is of high aristocratic birth, such as a princess, but a subject of the Empire and not of a sovereign family of reigning monarchs) is not morganatic, then this undermines the claim that marriages between other dynasts and subject noblewomen are morganatic.[citation needed] For example, if a Russian imperial dynast may equally marry a Princess Bagration-Moukhransky, then other dynasts obviously may, equality preserved, marry such personages as daughter of the Duke of Sasso-Ruffo, Princess Irina Paley who is descended from the self-same Romanov tsars, Princess Natalia Galitzine and Princess Alexandra Galitzine, who are descended from the House of Gediminas, the medieval sovereigns of Lithuania and Belarus with as high an ancestry as that of the Mukhrani Bagrations, distant descendants of medieval sovereigns in Georgia. Some Romanov princes would thus also be dynasts, in which case the male descent would not be totally extinct. This might suggest that sons born of such marriages of dynasts are as much heirs of Russia as Maria Vladimirovna, and in fact have a better dynastic claim, as no female is yet called to succeed. It is argued by Pieter Broek that prince Rostislav Rostislavich and princess Marina Vasilievna, born of two Galitzina princesses, are as dynastically born as Maria Vladimirovna of the Bagrationi mother. Since the extinction of the Korecki family in the 17th century, the Golitsyns/Galitzin have claimed dynastic seniority in the House of Gediminas. The Gediminids were a dynasty of monarchs of Grand Duchy of Lithuania that reigned from the 14th to the 16th century, and Emperor Peter I of Russia had permitted the Golitsyns to incorporate the emblem of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania into their coat of arms. They are related to the Rurik dynasty of Russia, for the family descends from a Lithuanian prince George, son of Patrikas and grandson of Narimantas, the second son of Grand Duke Gediminas of Lithuania. He had emigrated to the court of Vasily I and married his sister Anna Dmitriyevna. On these theories, Andrew Andreyevich Romanov (born 1923) may be the present Head of the imperial family.[citation needed] Some claim that there were no disenfranchised male dynasts in the imperial succession, but that very concept is dependent on the question of whether certain marriages were dynastical or not; thus, the concept ‘disenfranchised’ is empty of meaning here.[citation needed]
Kirill Vladimirovich and Princess Victoria Melita of Coburg
  • Kirill Vladimirovich’s 1905 marriage to Princess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha was not initially approved by the Emperor. However the marriage was later approved by Emperor Nicholas II in 1907, and Nicholas II accorded Victoria the title and style of “Her Imperial Highness Grand Duchess Victoria Feodorovna of Russia.”[22]
  • Princess Victoria had previously been married to Grand Duke Ernest Louis of Hesse. Supporters of Maria respond that the laws governing the Russian succession do not forbid marriage to divorcées.[2]
  • Kirill and Victoria were first cousins, and the Russian Orthodox Church prohibited first cousins marrying. Maria’s supporters point out that all other potential claimants are descended from the marriage of Tsar Nicholas I with his second cousin, similarly forbidden by Russian Orthodox canon– and if children of a marriage prohibited by reason of consanguinity were ineligible to succeed, Tsars Alexander II, Alexander III, and Nicholas II could not have validly succeeded to the throne. Moreover, the Emperor gave his retroactive approval to Kirill and Victoria’s marriage,[2] and the Emperor of Russia was then the supreme Head of the Russian Orthodox church. Opponents counter that the Emperor could not change church law by his own decision; instead, an act in ecclesiastical synods or councils would have been needed. However, the Orthodox Church does not treat children of uncanonical marriages as illegitimate nor deny their right to inherit.[2]
  • At the time of Kirill and Victoria’s marriage, Victoria was Protestant, not Orthodox. Maria and her supporters counter that this objection, too, is overcome by the Emperor’s approval of the marriage.[2] According to them, under dynastic law, the Emperor designated which of the dynasts had to marry Orthodox women; usually this was required only of persons who were high in the line of succession, which Kirill was not at the time of his marriage. The Orthodox church does not prohibit its members from marrying Protestants. And Victoria later embraced the Orthodox faith, receiving a published accolade from Tsar Nicholas II. At the time of Vladimir Kirilllovich’s birth in 1917, his mother had been Orthodox since 1907.[2]
Vladimir Alexandrovich and Princess Marie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin
  • Kirill Vladimirovich’s father, Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, married Duchess Marie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, a Lutheran who did not convert to Orthodoxy until she was already widowed. The arguments regarding the objections to this marriage are similar to the arguments regarding the religious objections to Kirill Vladimirovich’s marriage. It is quite clear, however, that Kirill and his brothers were considered throughout the life of the monarchy to be in the line of succession.
Roman Petrovich and Countess Praskovia Sheremeteva
  • If any of Maria Vladimirovna’s ancestors’ marriages were morganatic or otherwise invalid to pass on succession rights, Maria would seem to have no better claim than any other member of the family. While Nicholas Romanovich was not genealogically senior (he descended from a younger son of Nicholas I, and there are living descendants of Nicholas I’s older sons), his supporters assert that all those senior to him had lost their rights.[14] (For instance, Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich’s eldest son was Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich, and Dmitri’s son by a commoner wife, Audrey Emery, was Paul Romanovsky-Ilyinsky, whose son in turn is Dimitri Romanovsky-Ilyinsky, an American citizen. As a grand duke, Dmitri Pavlovich’s marriage to Emery was morganatic, so their descendants are excluded from the Imperial succession.[2]
  • While Nicholas’s mother was also not a member of a royal family, Nicholas argues that he did not thereby lose his right to the throne, for the laws of the Russian Empire required only grand dukes to marry brides of equal rank. Only the sons and male-line grandsons of tsars held the rank of grand duke. As Nicholas’ father – a great-grandson of Tsar Nicholas I – was only a prince, he was not required to marry a royal bride. In this way, Prince Nicholas claims to be in a different position from that of the descendants of Kirill Vladimirovich and Dmitri Pavlovich.[14] From 1922 until 1939 the Almanach de Gotha did not list Nicholas or Dimitri as members of the Imperial House and stated that the marriage was “not in conformity with the laws of the house.”[23] In the 1942 edition when the publication of the Gotha was under the control of the Third Reich, the Almanach de Gotha makes no mention that the marriage of the parents of Prince Nicholas is morganatic or that it does not comply with the house laws: both Nicholas and his brother Dimitri appear for the first time as members of the Imperial House. However, the last edition of the Almanach de Gotha published by Justus Perthes, in 1944, returned to the previous accepted understanding that the marriage of Nicholas’s parents was “not in conformity with the laws of the house.”[24] It has been suggested by scholars that during the Nazi period the editors of the Gotha were influenced by the Queen of Italy, Elena of Montenegro, who was the aunt of Nicholas and Dimitri Romanov.[25]
Other issues
  • Dowager Empress Marie Feodorovna and Grand Duke Nicholas Nicholaevich did not acknowledge the legitimacy of Kirill Vladimirovich’s claim during the 1920s.
  • Kirill Vladimirovich was one of the first defectors to abandon the Tsar and join, if not lead, the revolution in St. Petersburg, donning a red armband with the Preobrazhnsky guards. Some argue that as a Russian, a soldier, a grand duke, and a Romanov, this was an act of treason, which calls into question the legitimacy of his and his descendants’ claim to the throne. Alternatively, although Kirill is often alleged to have abandoned his post by leading his troops into town to place them at the disposal of the revolutionary Petrograd Soviet which had occupied the Duma’s Tauride Palace, he maintained that he responded to the call of the functioning remnant of the Duma, the Provisional Committee, (which was also holed up at the Tauride while vying for power with the Soviet): it was to this latter body that Kirill and his regiment actually reported for military duty that day.[20]

Claimant support

Maria Vladimirovna has the support of most monarchist groups and followers,[26] most societies of Russian nobles — including the Assembly of the Russian Nobility,[27][26] and recognition of her claim by the head of the Russian Orthodox Church,[26] Kirill I Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia who, in a televised March 2013 interview, stated “Today, none of those persons who are descendants of the Romanoffs are pretenders to the Russian throne. But in the person of Grand Duchess Maria Wladimirovna and her son, Georgii, the succession of the Romanoffs is preserved — no longer to the Russian Imperial throne, but to history itself” (Сегодня никто из лиц, принадлежащих к потомкам Романовых, не претендует на Российский престол. Но в лице Великой княгини Марии Владимировны и ее сына Георгия сохраняется преемственность Романовых — уже не на Российском императорском престоле, а просто в истории).[28] The Russian Orthodox Church Abroad has also recognised Maria Vladimirovna as Head of the Russian Imperial House.[29]

The Romanov Family Association (RFA) has as members most of the morganatic descendants of the dynasty.[26] Its president was acknowledged as the foremost family representative when Nicholas II and his family’s remains were interred in St. Petersburg in July 1998, and at several other government-sponsored memorial occasions. By contrast, Maria Vladimirovna has, at those same events, generally been acknowledged as occupying the foremost position in church-organised solemnities, such as masses for relic veneration.

Line of succession to the former Romanian throne

note:
As of August 2020.

See also:
Line of succession to the former Monarchical throne and others : From (deleted) Wikipedia’s articles.


The succession order to the throne of the Romanian monarchy, abolished since 1947, was regulated by the monarchical constitution of 1938, suspended by the Royal Law Decree no. 3052 of September 1940 and the 1884 Law of the Romanian Royal House Rules enacted pursuant to the 1866 Constitution of Romania which had confirmed the enthronement of Prince Karl (Carol) of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. The 1938 Constitution stipulated Salic law, according to which the throne was hereditary in King Carol I’s legitimate descent and, if his male issue failed, in the descent of his brothers of the Sigmaringen princely branch of the House of Hohenzollern, according to agnatic primogeniture and to the perpetual exclusion of females and their descendants. The last monarch to reign in Romania was King Michael I, who was born in 1921, abdicated his throne on 30 December 1947 under coercion,[1][2][3] and went into exile in Switzerland. He died on 5 December 2017 in Aubonne, Switzerland.

Present situation

The last King, Michael I, had no sons, nor are there any undisputed legitimate male-line male descendants of the previous kings of Romania.

There are male line descendants of King Carol II: Paul of Romania (b. 1948), his son Carol Ferdinand (b. 2010), and Alexandru Hohenzollern (b. 1961). Paul and Alexandru are the sons of Mircea Carol Hohenzollern, also known as Mircea Carol Grigore of Romania (according to his Romanian birth certificate).[4][5] Mircea Carol (8 August 1920 – 27 January 2006) is the issue of King Carol II’s first marriage to Zizi Lambrino, which marriage had been declared null and void on 18 January 1919 by a Romanian court.[6] In 1955, however, a Portuguese court declared Mircea Carol as former King Carol II’s legitimate son, a ruling later confirmed by a Parisian court[citation needed]. The court rulings allowed him to bear the surname Hohenzollern and to inherit a portion of his father’s properties, but did not confer upon him any dynastic rights to the defunct Romanian throne or rights to bear a princely title and style, despite his use of both.[7] In October 1995 a Romanian court ruling also recognized Mircea Carol as a legitimate son of Carol II, allowing him the right to bear the surname “al României”, a ruling which evoked some speculation that called into question the status of Michael.[8] The court ruling was cited by Paul to assert a right to the title “Prince”.[5] The argument which appears prevalent is that Mircea Carol’s sons would not be entitled to succession rights, due to the non-dynastic nature of their grandparents’ marriage.[6] Moreover, Mircea Carol never claimed any right to the Romanian throne,[9] unlike his son, Paul.

Following King Michael’s abdication, the line of succession was discussed during a meeting between Michael, his uncle Prince Nicholas of Romania, and Frederick, Prince of Hohenzollern (1891–1965). Shortly after this meeting, the spokesman of Carol II, in an interview with the French paper Le Figaro, said that Carol, who was not in contact with Michael, strongly supported Prince Frederick, additionally asserting that Michael would never regain the throne.[10]

According to the succession provisions of the kingdom’s suspended constitution, that of 1938, agnatic primogeniture and so-called “Salic law” determine who would inherit the throne. After two intervening changes of regime, that constitution no longer carries legal weight, although the 1884 Law of Romanian Royal House Rules was never abrogated.[11] It must also be said that the remaining current German Hohenzollerns in the succession line descend from the previously mentioned Prince Frederick and his brother Prince Franz Joseph, the sons of Wilhelm, Prince of Hohenzollern (Wilhelm’s father, Prince Leopold renounced his rights in 1880), who renounced his rights to the Romanian throne, on 20 December 1886,[12] in favor of his younger brother, the future King Ferdinand.[13]

Male-preference primogeniture

On 30 December 2007, the 60th anniversary of his loss of the throne, the former King Michael issued the Fundamental Rules of the Royal House of Romania.[14] in which he again appealed to the Romanian Parliament to alter the Salic Law of succession, should the Romanian nation and Parliament consider restoring the monarchy in the future,[14] and calling for the first in line of succession to be Michael’s eldest daughter, newly titled “Crown Princess of Romania” and “Custodian of the Romanian Crown”. This decree was explicitly based on “the values of Romanian society” and on EU legislation, specifically the European Convention on Human Rights (which, however, does not guarantee any right to reign as a monarch in any country). The document clarifies the order of inheritance of Michael’s fortune and claim to the Romanian throne. The private castles of the former monarch in Romania – Săvârșin and Pelișor – are to be held by the successor in this line.

It is an act with eminently symbolic importance in the absence of its approval by the Parliament,[11][15] and the declaration is alleged by some to be undemocratic.[16]

It also attempts to replace the 1884 Statutory Law. According to this private statute Michael had, in 1997, already designated his oldest child (Margareta) as successor to “all” his “prerogatives and rights”, indicating his desire for a gender-blind succession to the throne.[17][18] Only the Parliament could amend the succession rules together with the Constitution in which they had been included, assuming the monarchy were first restored.

The line of succession, as published in Addendum I of the 2007 Statute, modified by Michael in 2014 to remove his daughter Irina and her children and grandchildren,[19] and then modified again in 2015 to remove his grandson Nicholas,[20] consists of:[14]

  • King Michael I (1921–2017)
    • Princess Margareta (born 1949)
    • (1) Princess Elena (b. 1950)
      • (2) Elisabeta Karina de Roumanie Medforth-Mills (b. 1989)
    • (3) Princess Sophie (b. 1957)
      • (4) Elisabeta Maria de Roumanie Biarneix (b. 1999)
    • (5) Princess Marie (b. 1964)

 

 

As the above list exhausts all the dynastic members of the present Royal House of former king Michael I, the line would not continue with the German Hohenzollerns mentioned above. In fact, this private Statute through Addendum I, explicitly allows only direct descendants of King Michael as dynasts; unlike the old succession rules, the German Hohenzollerns are no longer mentioned as potential dynasts. Contrary to a specific provision of the 1923 Constitution, the private Statute bars from the succession any prince from another, foreign dynasty.

According to the former President of Romania Traian Băsescu, who does not appreciate Crown Princess Margareta’s husband,[21] the Romanians seem to think that were the monarchy restored, Radu would become their king (king consort), something which, according to Băsescu, impacts negatively the Romanians’ public perception of the idea of monarchy.[22][23]

Succession by Salic law

  • Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern (1835–1905)
    • Wilhelm, Prince of Hohenzollern (1864–1927)[12]
      • Friedrich, Prince of Hohenzollern (1891–1965)
        • Friedrich Wilhelm, Prince of Hohenzollern (1924–2010)
          • Karl Friedrich, Prince of Hohenzollern (born 1952)
            • (1) Alexander, Hereditary Prince of Hohenzollern (b. 1987)
          • (2) Prince Albrecht of Hohenzollern (b. 1954)
          • (3) Prince Ferdinand of Hohenzollern (b. 1960)
            • (4) Prince Aloys of Hohenzollern (b. 1999)
            • (5) Prince Fidelis of Hohenzollern (b. 2001)
        • Prince Johann Georg of Hohenzollern (1932–2016)
          • (6) Prince Carl Christian of Hohenzollern (b. 1962)
            • (7) Prince Nicolas of Hohenzollern (b. 1999)
          • (8) Prince Hubertus of Hohenzollern (b. 1966)
        • (9) Prince Ferfried of Hohenzollern (b. 1943)
      • Prince Franz Joseph of Hohenzollern (1891–1964)
        • Prince Emanuel of Hohenzollern (1929–1999)
          • (10) Prince Carl Alexander of Hohenzollern (b. 1970)
    • King Ferdinand I (1865–1927)
      • King Carol II (1893–1953)
        • Carol Lambrino (1920–2006) X
          • Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern (b. 1948) X
            • Carol Ferdinand (b. 2010) X
          • Alexander Hohenzollern (b. 1961) X
        • King Michael I (1921–2017)

Notes:

X Excluded due to the annulment of Carol II’s marriage to Zizi Lambrino.

 

 

In case of the extinction without any direct male heirs of all eligible Hohenzollerns or of their refusal to accept the throne, according to article 35 of the last royal Constitution of Romania from 1938,[24] the throne becomes vacant. In this situation, article 35 provided that the last reigning king had the right to nominate a foreign prince from a reigning dynasty of Western Europe as successor, subject to the Parliament’s approval as required by article 36. The Parliament incurs the final responsibility, according to article 36, of electing a king from a reigning dynasty of Western Europe if, prior to his investiture, he had committed to raise his descendants in the Eastern Orthodox faith to comply with article 34 of the Constitution.

In 1997, Romanian monarchist leaders asked former King Michael to designate a male heir presumptive from the German branch of the family, in keeping with the rules of the last royal constitution. Under the influence of his wife Anne, the former King rejected the request and, at the end of 1997, he illegally designated his first born, Princess Margarita, as heir presumptive.[25]

In a 2009 interview, Karl Friedrich, then Hereditary Prince of Hohenzollern, stated that he was not interested in the Romanian throne.[26]

Line of Succession in December 1947

  • Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern (1835–1905)
    • Wilhelm, Prince of Hohenzollern (1864–1927)[12]
      • (2) Friedrich, Prince of Hohenzollern (b. 1891)
        • (3) Friedrich Wilhelm, Hereditary Prince of Hohenzollern (b. 1924)
        • (4) Prince Franz Josef of Hohenzollern (b. 1926)
        • (5) Prince Johann Georg of Hohenzollern (b. 1932)
        • (6) Prince Ferfried of Hohenzollern (b. 1943)
      • (7) Prince Franz Joseph of Hohenzollern (b. 1891)
        • (8) Prince Karl Anton of Hohenzollern (b. 1922)
        • (9) Prince Meinrad Leopold of Hohenzollern (b. 1925)
        • (10) Prince Emanuel of Hohenzollern (b. 1929)
    • King Ferdinand I (1865–1927)
      • King Carol II (b. 1893)
        • Carol Lambrino (b. 1920) X
        • King Michael I (b. 1921)
      • (1) Prince Nicholas of Romania (1903-1978)
    • Prince Karl Anton of Hohenzollern (1868–1919)
      • (11) Prince Albrecht of Hohenzollern (1898-1977)
        • (12) Prince Godehard of Hohenzollern (1939-2001)